Drinkinss, смотрите ( ув. marko - уж не обессудьте что на аглицком. может существуют подобные статьи в русскоязычных изданиях - просто не знаю )
статья из очень уважаемого часового издания -
http://www.watchtime.com/blog/monoch...mt-goodplanet/
Читаем:
Omega finally introduced a GMT version of the Seamaster PO, and it’s equipped with Omega’s in-house Caliber 8605 with GMT time-zone function. In our review of the Seamaster Planet Ocean 600M Chrono, we concluded that its well-known competitor, the Rolex Sea-Dweller Deepsea, had some serious competition. Now we’re curious to find out whether the Rolex GMT-Master II also gets a true competitor with this Omega Seamaster PO GMT.
читаеми дальше:
Now that it has been equipped with a GMT function (to be precise, a traveler’s GMT), it has become even more complete. In my opinion this is the best alternative for those who want an alternative to the Rolex GMT-Master II. It’s actually the only real competition for Rolex in this segment.
другая статья -
https://monochrome-watches.com/omega...-review-price/
The Omega Seamaster 300 Master Co-Axial was much anticipated by collectors. Omega was clearly not allowed to do a single mistake with this watch. Not only did they manage to do this, Omega pleased us with a superb and inspired design, with very cool details (hands and indices) and a high quality construction, but they pushed the concept still further with this truly amazing movement. Now, we have to compare the SM300 to its largest competitor, another icon of the dive watches, the Rolex Submariner. The latter is clearly not playing on the vintage trend and goes for rigor. Both are equally well finished, both have an in-house calibre, both can be used as proper diving tools. The Omega however clearly stands out with its antimagnetic movement (Rolex cannot compete here, even with the Milgauss). The specs are clearly on Omega’s side. Design-wise, it is certainly more a matter of tastes than an objective choice.
The price however is another story. The Rolex Submariner no-date Ref. 114060 is priced at 6,000 euros. The SM300 in steel is priced at 4,950 euros (6,750 euros in titanium). And here, in all objectivity, we have to admit that Omega has a clear advantage considering the technical package.
третья -
https://monochrome-watches.com/omega...rono-reviewed/
I believe this is the only serious competitor for the Rolex Sea-Dweller Deepsea in the market. Both feature a great in-house movement and more or less the same look and feel. A robust luxury dive watch. The Omega also adds a chronograph, while the Deepsea can be taken down to 3900 meters in stead of the 600 meters of the Seamaster POC. But let’s be real… who really goes that deep with a luxury dive watch on the wrist?
Если задаться целью - можно найти десятки подобных статей из различных часовых изданий. Нельзя же засунуть голову в песок и ничего не видеть.
