|
Цитата:
но он временно недоступен до 1 ноября:rolleyes: |
Цитата:
|
8500
View Poll Results: +/- secs/day for your Omega 8500 movement?
Voters - 36. 0.5 or less - 13 36.11% 1 - 9 25.00% 1.5 - 0 0% 2 - 5 13.89% 2.5 - 5 13.89% 3 or more - 4 11.11% http://forums.watchuseek.com/f20/ome...cy-744761.html "PO 8500 running fast ...about 2 seconds in 12 days." "haven't worn my 8500 in over a week... when i took it off the winder and put it on today, it had gained 5 seconds in 8 days" "My Constellation gains one second per day with crown up at night. With the crown down, it gains one second per week! I'm not a fanatic about accuracy, but it is great when you get a mechanical movement that performs this well." "My other 8500 powered watch is like -3 seconds a day. Quite consistently since it was new in 2009 until now. My one example of the 9300, on the other hand, is awesome at +1 second a day" "My 9300 POC is +2/day" http://forums.timezone.com/index.php...=6017208&rid=0 "I am happy to report that it's even more accurate than my beloved PO, which averages out at - .6 sec/day. MY AT 8500 is a TOTAL of + 1 second, after a full 10 days" "My AT 8500 runs at a more pedestrian -1 sec/day. ... My 9300 - I have given up on trying to figure out exactly where it's at, because over the two or three days in a row I am likely to wear it, it is essentially spot on. I once had it on for an entire week and I think it gained a second. Maybe." "My 8500 watches were the most consistently accurate watches I've ever owned barring Quartz." "My Hour Vision with 8500 Coax movement is two year old and ... still "dead on" - I forget to even check it sometimes for weeks" http://forums.timezone.com/index.php...=6226652&rid=0 и сотни подобных отзывов в сети ... Hour Vision в течении полутора-двух лет +1-2 |
Цитата:
Цитата:
А что у Вас с ориентацией не так ? Как можно путать ориентацию? Цитата:
|
Цитата:
Цитата:
|
Цитата:
Я показывал фото теста 6s37, это механизм в принципе одного с 8l35 класса - топовый из простых Сеек, но еще не ГС. Сегодня еще раз сделал, на 100% завода пружины -1 -2 0 -3 +1 -4 т.е. расхождение в 5 секунд, 0т -4 до +1, выкачка в 4-х положениях 0 мс, и в двух положениях 0,1 и 0,2 мс Ну вроде это хороший результат, нет? |
Цитата:
Цитата:
|
Цитата:
Movement: Caliber 8500 (stainless steel; Caliber 8501 has a gold balance bridge and gold rotor); diameter = 29 mm (13 lignes); height of Caliber 8500 = 5.5 mm; height of Caliber 8501 = 5.6 mm; 39 jewels; co-axial escapement with freely oscillating balance spring without index; Nivarox-Anachron balance spring; moment of inertia = 21 mg x cm2; angle of lift = 38°; 25,200 vph (3.5 hertz); Nivachoc shock absorption; Caliber 8500 has a heavy metal rotor, Caliber 8501 has a solid gold rotor; each rotor winds in both directions of rotation; two barrels; approx. 60 hour power reserve; rapid adjustment for the date display; stop-seconds function; COSC chronometer certification. Results of rate test: (When fully wound / after 24 hours / after 39 hours) (Deviations in seconds per 24 hours) Dial up: +1 +2 +2 Dial down: +3 +5 +4 Crown down: 0 +1 +2 Crown left: +3 +5 +2 Crown up: +1 +3 +3 Crown right: 0 +1 +2 Greatest deviation of rate: 3 4 2 Mean deviation: +1.3 +2.8 +2.5 Mean amplitude flat positions: 292° 259° 245° hanging positions: 276° 244° 223° Maximum difference between the vertical positions: 4° 3° 5° http://www.watchtime.at/archive/wt_2...007_05_142.pdf WatchTime TEST: Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra Movement: Omega Caliber 8500, automatic; chronometer; 25,200 vph; 39 jewels; co-axial escapement, fine adjustment via four white-gold screws on the freely oscillating balance; two serially arranged barrels; Nivachoc shock absorption; 60-hour power reserve; diameter = 29mm; height = 5.5mm Rate results: (Deviations in seconds per 24 hours) Dial up +3 Dial down +5 Crown up +2 Crown down +1 Crown left +3 Crown right 0 Greatest deviation of rate: 5 Average deviation +2.3 Mean amplitude Flat positions 253° Hanging positions 239° http://www.watchtime.at/archive/wt_2...011_02_132.pdf WatchTime TEST: Omega SeaMaster Planet Ocean Chronograph Movement: Omega 9300, automatic, chronometer; 28,800 vph; 54 jewels; two barrels; Nivachoc shock absorption; Glucydur balance; fine adjustment via weight screws on the balance; co-axial escapement; 60-hour power reserve; diameter = 32.5 mm; height = 7.6 mm Rate results (Deviations in seconds per 24 hours, without/with chronograph switched on): Dial up +2 +2 Dial down +3 +3 Crown up +6 +4 Crown down +1 0 Crown left +4 +4 Crown right +2 +1 Greatest deviation of rate: 5 4 Average deviation: +3 +2.3 Mean amplitude: Flat positions 277° 292° Hanging positions 256° 262° http://www.watchtime.at/archive/wt_2...011_05_098.pdf WatchTime Test: Omega Seamaster Ploprof Movement: Omega 8500, automatic, chronometer; 25,200 vph; 39 jewels; two barrels; Nivachoc shock absorption; Glucydur balance; fine adjustment via weight screws on the balance; co-axial escapement; 60-hour power reserve; diameter = 29 mm, height = 5.5 mm Rate results (Deviations in seconds per 24 hours): Dial up +1 Dial down +2 Crown up +1 Crown down 0 Crown left +3 Crown right +2 Greatest deviation of rate: 3 Average deviation: +1.5 Average amplitude: Flat positions 275° Hanging positions 276° http://www.watchtime.com/reviews/sin...omega-ploprof/ |
Цитата:
|
Цитата:
продажи закрыты - это значит что Сейко не продает запчасти для ГС (в отличие от ЕТА, например)? если так, то наверное от того, что не желает, чтобы часы ремонтировал кто-попало, только на фабрике или оф. сервисе |
Часовой пояс UTC +3, время: 12:43. |